Aggregation of fillers blended into random elastomeric networks: Theory and comparison with experiments
Loading...

Date
2006
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Bronze
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
66
OpenAIRE Views
57
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
A theoretical model describing aggregation of filler particles in amorphous elastomers is proposed. The model is based on a counting technique originally used in genome analysis to characterize the size and distribution of overlapping segments randomly placed on a DNA molecule. In the present model, the particles are first assumed to aggregate randomly upon mixing into the elastomer and then-sizes are calculated. The sizes and distributions of aggregates are also studied in the presence of attractive interparticle forces. Results of the proposed model are compared with experimental data on silica-filled end-linked poly(dimethyl-siloxane) networks. Comparison of the theory and experiment shows that the random aggregation assumption where no attractive forces exist between the particles is not valid and a significant attraction between the silica particles is needed in the theory to justify the experimental data obtained using atomic force microscopy. For filler content below 1.45 vol.-%, the model agrees, qualitatively, with experiment and shows the increase in cluster size with increasing amount of filler. It also explains the increase in the dispersion of aggregate sizes with increasing amount of filler. © 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Description
Keywords
Aggregation, Fillers, Nanoparticles, Poly(dimethylsiloxane), Silica, QD Chemistry
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 010402 general chemistry, 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology, 01 natural sciences, 0104 chemical sciences, 02100102 Cellulose/Polysaccharides, 01040204 Polymers/Materials science, 0210 nano-technology
Citation
15
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
13
Source
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
Volume
207
Issue
16
Start Page
End Page
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 13
Scopus : 16
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7

